Michael Kingsbury wrote: >No, but you do have the benefit of moving the SQL database to hardware other >than the mail server. I'd think that an SQL backend would allow for better >clustering than flat files as well. > >-mike >
What's wrong with a NFS server for the maildir locations? Central, clusterable, scaleable, and easy to configure.... netapp comes to mind.... _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
