Dan Yost writes: > moves past an obvious RFC violation. So, with all trepidation, I simply > ask: shouldn't Courier trim the RR list as per RFC 974, eliminating > irrelevant RRs, and then try to deliver based on what's left after the
No. There's nothing 'irrelevant' about it. It's an MX record, for the requested hostname. What's so 'irrelevant' about it? -- Sam _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
