On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 04:29:31PM -0400, Courier User wrote: > Of course people should upgrade their OS's. But I don't see why it > is so important to avoid making a small and effective change to > share/courierctl.start that will prevent this bug from biting people > in the future.
You're right. This small change would make the script more robust, and Sam might even make the change. It's just that you attacked him by saying his script was not portable, whereas it is. Had you approached the situation by proposing a bug in sh, and asking Sam for a fix to the script to make it more robust, he would probably have accepted it happily. Remember that he's doing a lot of hard work, and accusing him of distributing incorrect without proper justification will only make him more defensive. Do you blame him? -- Anand Buddhdev Personal site: http://anand.org _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
