On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 07:11:03PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Ben Rosengart writes: > > >On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:55:13PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >>Ben Rosengart writes: > >> > >>>Simple: we generate a userdb on host A, in /export/foo. We read > >>>it on host B, in /foo. Please do not suggest that we maintain two > >>>builds of courier-imap. I don't think you would appreciate it if > >>>someone treated you as if your time had no value, so please don't > >>>do the same to me. > >> > >>And you cannot symlink /foo/userdb.dat and /foo/userdbshadow.dat to > >>/export because... > > > >No reason, as long as I only have one set of users. As soon > >as I build host C, with a different set of users, I'm screwed. > > This is where you lost me. What exactly is the problem with host C?
I need to manage it from host A. Now I either have to maintain separate builds of courier-imap, or delete and recreate the symlink every time either database is rebuilt (and make sure never to try to update both databases at once). -- Ben Rosengart (212) 741-4400 x215 Microsoft has argued that open source is bad for business, but you have to ask, "Whose business? Theirs, or yours?" --Tim O'Reilly ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
