On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 20:29, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Peer Oliver Schmidt writes: > > > Does the "now" imply you are thinking about adding alias handling via DB > > to other authentication methods as well? *drool* > > Well, eventually. I don't see many people doing it. A lot of people are > doing it via LDAP, which is why it's there.
How can you see people using SQL alias handling if it isn't available? Mmm, maybe you refer to auth. Either way, I think that SQL alias is a must for a complete SQL backend. > > > The past couple of weeks I thought about writing a feature request for > > this. It is the one thing that keeps me from moving to a SQL DB backend > > for authentication. > > This is separate from authentication. It's basically a separate table, > listing the aliases. Given a carefully-designed schema you could, perhaps, > implement both functionalities with a single table. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving > your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL > certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get > started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en > _______________________________________________ > courier-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users -- Eduardo Roldan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
