Ignoring your questions of stability (since I don't use the MTA portion), and going off topic purely out of curiosity, I'd like to ask you briefly...

On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 20:05 US/Central, Systems Administrator wrote:

PS. for those wondering why I picked SquirrelMail, there are two reasons:
1. There's a SquirrelMail patch which supports the ACAP protocol, and
I'm keen to see ACAP more widely used. For details on ACAP, see:
http://dave.cridland.net/acap/
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/acap-charter.html



Is there a decent, and hopefully easy to work with, ACAP implementation out there anywhere? I tried one some time ago, but it was a pain to get working, and I gave up.



2. I prefer to keep the web server and the mail server separate

:)


Do you mean 'keep the _webmail_ server and the mail server separate'? Or are you under the impression that sqwebmail runs its own http service? Just curious because of your phrasing.


-jab



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to