As an aside... (and something I've been meaning to ask...)
Oh, Sa-a-a-a-am...?
... Why does Courier reply with "NO Error in IMAP command...." in some protocol error situations like this, rather than with a "BAD" message? "NO" responses are supposed to be used for "operational errors" not "protocol errors".
I do not see any difference between the two. Both mean that the command failed. The finer points of why the command failed doesn't make a substantial difference.
<mime-attachment>
Well, I see a pretty clear difference personally. -- But then... I suppose it does not make a "substantial difference" to any clients.
However, I do find this attitude a bit strange coming from someone like you, who is such a stickler for following the specs in many other ways.
*shrug* Whatever though, it's never caused a problem that I know of. It's just been bugging me a little bit is all.
-jab
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
