--On Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 15:17 -0500 Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gather that this was originally BOFHCHECKDNS? did some copy&paste... > Why just HELO and not also EHLO ? The code in ehlo() will be executed in both cases, no need to differentiate between the two variants. > That being said, this is a cool addition that I'm sure people will find > useful. Its currently an ugly hack, the 'real' solution will have to be placed somewhere else and requires more changes in the code. But not as ugly as the 100 Sobig piling up in one single mailbox per day (the address has been a victim of every trojan since Klez) and I dont see why courier should not be able to simply reject on mangled helo like postfix. Roland ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
