On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Courier User writes: > > >However, the following case is not specifically mentioned, and so > >can I therefore assume that it is not covered? ... > > > > badfrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Reject all mail with the return address of > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Correct. It is not covered.
Thank you. Was this case omitted for a specific reason, or was it left out as an oversight? If there was no specific reason for this omission, is there any chance that this case will be offered in a future release of Courier? -- Courier User [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
