Hey Lucio - we use the list... patches are posted, and appreciated by many, adopted by 
some or added to the base code.

Patch, post and be loved! ;-)

Thanks.

m/

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lucio
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 5:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users] RE: Courier and dsbl.org


> > The
> > problem is that it refuses the domain literal in dotted quad form
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), replying "Syntax error". I suspect the square
> > brackets being the problem.
>
> Unfortunately, Courier does not currently support the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> notation, neither in version 0.37 nor in the latest version available from
> the Courier website[1].

According to dsbl.org and to RFC 822, 1123 and 2821, a compliant mail server 
must accept that notation. Now, I suspect that no one claims Courier to be 
compliant to these RFCs, but I wonder if I'm the only one to consider this a 
bug. If Courier broke some other part of the same RFCs, that would definitely 
be regarded as a bug, so why not the support for this notation?

I would be happy to write the necessary patch, but I have not found any links 
for bugs/patches submission. Are you aware of any?

>
> As a temporary work-around, as Alexei Batyr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned on
> this list just today, you might be able to make Courier accept the message
> by creating an alias address of the exact form required by DSBL in your
> /etc/courier/aliases file:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: postmaster

Thanks for the suggestion, but it didn't solve the problem (obviusly the 
change above requires issuing a "makealiases" which I did).

>
> I don't know whether this will work well enough to get you off the DSBL
> list, though.  Good luck!
>

It didn't work at all. The same "Syntax error" is being reported by the mail 
server.
Now I guess that syntax checking is done by Courier *before* looking up the 
aliases database, so I wonder if this workaround could effectively work in a 
newer version of Courier, where syntax checking might have been changed. 
However I'd like someone telling me if I'm correct before I start making 
major changes to my mail server, maybe only to realize they were useless.

Lucio.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to