Carlos Paz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [invalid MX records pointing to IP addresses]
> 
> Yes, I'm totally aware that the domain with broken MX records is at
> fault, but telling this reason to an unhappy user won't solve the
> problem, and you can't really argue against their pragmatic approach:

What problem?  The problem definitely is the broken MX record, and there are only two 
ways to get rid of it:  1. make it a non-problem by breaking your software, too, or  
2. make the receiver domain's tech-c fix the misconfiguration.

We all know the results of continually applying #1 to web browsers for years, so yes, 
we *can* argue against their pragmatic approach.

> So, our only choice as sysadmins is to add static routes in esmtproutes,
> apologize to our user, try to convince him that it's not our fault, and
> send a mail to the postmaster of that domain, asking them to please fix
> their DNS.

This leads us to a *real* problem with the standards compliance of Courier: you can't 
send mail to <(post|host|net)[EMAIL PROTECTED]> using Courier because it's simply not 
supported, although the standards mandate it.  This problem comes up on the list from 
time to time, and someone even said he would write a patch.  Unfortunately, I fear 
there's little chance that this functionality will ever appear in the official Courier 
distribution.  I think *this* would be something worth supporting, not MX->IPaddress 
records.

> I'm not against this policy on the case of MX pointing to CNAMEs since
> this is more problematic,

Besides, the RFCs don't even strictly prohibit MX->CNAME, but really only discourage 
it[1].

> But I find a little "extreme" that courier will fail the message even
> when valid, first choice MX servers are available, but a secondary or
> lower priority bad MX record is found.

Agreed.

> I would prefer Sam to produce an official patch, and give us the choice
> to perform this checks or no. "BE_A_MX_WHORE" sounds like a good name
> for the controlling env var I think ;-)

Agreed.

[1] http://www.mengwong.com/misc/rfc1912-is-wrong.html



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to