> spamc passes the username to spamd, which then looks up the user's home > directory. I don't think that moving spamc into place as courier's > delivery agent is going to help, as HOME will not be used. I don't > think that HOME is ever used by SpamAssassin. It's mentioned once in > the code, but I'm not sure how it'd be triggered.
This is correct. Several months ago, I brought this up on the SA list, suggesting that someone who knew the code better than me could hack in HOME recognition pretty easily (there are other variables that spamc gives to spamd, and HOME looked like it would be pretty easy to add). Unfortunately, the general answer I got from people was "why would anyone want to do that - why not just use mysql configuration, etc?" With that attitude, I took it that even if I took the time to patch spamd to accept HOME, and found a C coder (which I am not) to patch spamc, the patch would likely be ignored. -Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
