Roger B.A. Klorese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: > > Acknowledging that my opinion isn't worth much, this seems stupid. As > > described, the solution would require all of the work that SPF does > > (http://spf.pobox.com/), plus additional computation. What's the > > additional check get you? > > If the particular server is who it says it is, and I trust its > certificate, I don't really have to care what domain it's sending mail > for. The method will support roaming users on multiple networks, for > instance, in a way SPF cannot.
In which way? Could you please describe an abstract requirements scenario which cannot be satisfied by SPF? BTW, as far as I understand it, Yahoo's scheme is not about certificates which need to be trusted. It's about checking mail "signatures" which could only possibly have been generated by the sending domain's owner. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
