"Mitch \(WebCob\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2906 > > I reported this a long time ago, basically, the courier received line does > not match the tests applied by Spam Assassin... this results in false > positives on thinks like SORBS and DYNA_BLOCK for your own authenticated > users... > > [ ... ] > > So there is the reference to the code, I can post some example Received > headers, wanted to make sure I was posting correct stuff - not sure if I > remember 100% on Lloyds ID patch acceptance, but it would probably effect > the situation as well - should be optional to cover the bases, but I thought > that this would be the best place to get the gammut of header variations > over recent history so that a working regex can be developed.
Going to the above link currently results in this error: Bugzilla is currently broken. Please try again later. [ ... ] So yes, please do post some example headers, and possibly a description of the exact Received: header formatting characteristics that spamassassin has problems with. After digging through Courier when I did the "id" patch, I can say with some degree of confidence that a formatting change would probably not require much of a code change on the Courier side. I'm not necessarily advocating this solution, but I'm just making the point in case it turns out to be more desirable to change Courier's Received: format than to modify spamassassin's regexp's. -- Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
