Thomas von Hassel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 24/4-2004, at 18.45, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for a list of 5xx (E)SMTP result codes that are commonly in
>> use these days.
>>
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1893.txt
>
> should give you some idea....
>
> /thomas
Thanks.
In this document, the "dot" versions of the codes are described.
For example,
X.1.7 Bad sender's mailbox address syntax
The sender's address was syntactically invalid. This can
apply to any field in the address.
How does this "dot" based scheme relate to the codes that we commonly
see these days? If the codes we see are simply these RFC1893 codes
without the dots, then how do the following two Courier messages (for
example) related to the above X.1.7 scheme?
417 DNS lookup failure: foo.bar.yuckorama.com
517 Sender rejected: foo.bar.yuckorama.com
(this one occurs for anyone marked as "badfrom"
in Courier's "bofh" file)
The connection between X.1.7 and the 417/517 examples above seems
tenuous, at best.
I'm hoping that somone could point me to a more up-to-date list that
illustrates how the non-"dot" versions of the codes are commonly used
nowadays (that RFC came out in 1996).
Thanks again, in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman 01234567 <-- The world famous Indent-o-Meter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ^
God bless you.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
