On Mon, 10 May 2004, Jeff Potter wrote: > > Are there any plans to change it? Checking aliases table would be very > > nice - aliases were thought not to create many "dummy" users, which > > only > > send their e-mail to another account(s). > It's just not written. (Wanna write it?) I think alias replacement > happens at a much earlier stage than user lookups, hence why aliases > like user-default don't work, iirc. But I haven't looked at the code to > verify this... someone else who knows should probably chime in...
My question was: is it possible to write such code and include it in future releases? This is important question: I don't know if it is even possible (maybe courier architecture excludes that), if it will not break any rfc, and if Sam agree :-) At the very first stage - incomming mail message - the system knows if it can accept mail for a domain. So it knows hosteddomains. The alias replacement is later and it should not be very complicated to include wildcard hosted domains in alias processing (I haven't looked into courier code, so I guess). -- Grzegorz Janoszka ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
