> is it an unrealistic or unintelligent approach to limit the amount of
> mail that can be sent with a server?

Don't think that would work for a variety of reasons...

Many users read their email, reply and press send, but the ACTUAL sending
occurs every few minutes in batches - what happens - they get deferred or
queued?

Assuming they are queued, client A sends interoffice mail to other users and
gets huge delays on sending?

Don't think it would make anyone happy. We log our mail sent, and process
the logs to catch abusers. We virus scan to prevent spread of viruses... We
restrict users from submitting mail through webscripts without
authentication...

No abuse so far. Our AUP says we'll cut them off and they know it.

Just my 2 pennies.

m/




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to