Julian writes:
>If your users complain about your mailserver not working well with
Microsoft products,
>and if that is because Microsoft products are incompliant to established
internet
> standards, tell your users about it and suggest not using Microsoft
products.
We've all got to play the cards we are dealt. Since we are unlikely to reach
consensus on this, lets move on.
>I think adding such checks and issuing a syntax error in the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]'>
case would be the way to go. >But maybe there's a good reason why Courier
doesn't do that?
This would solve my problem nicely. It would add a bit more time and CPU
cycles to the connection overhead. This would be plausibly offset by the
CPU cycles of sending a reject later on.
I could potentially collaborate on some code changes {sounds of Sam
shrieking}.
I haven't seen any cases where courier rejects an address in this fashion,
to figure out where to shoe-horn the code in. Any ideas?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
