Randy "PerlStalker" Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > There's been several different versions of SPF documentation floating > > around. > > > > Courier uses the logic documented in draft-mengwong-spf-01.txt, see > > that document for the definition of these results. > > Are there any concerns that the different specs could conflict (now or > in the future)? (Let's ingore MS's attempt to embrace and extend it for > the purposes of this discussion. :-))
Actually, <http://spf.pobox.com/spf-draft-200406.txt> is the current authoritative draft, but it has only minor editorial differences to <http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-01.txt>. (There is another draft by Mark Lentczner, <http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/spf/draft-lentczner-spf-00.txt>, but this one is unofficial.) The SPF project is currently working on creating a new official draft which should resolve most of the open issues of the current official draft. It should be ready in Q1 of 2005. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
