Thus spake Bill Taroli on Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:54:38PM CST > > This thread brings a question to mind though... if I don't really care > about GUI's... is couriermlm just a black sheep cousin not worthy of our > time? :-) I've been using it successfully for some time, and haven't > really cared about having a pretty interface on it.
Couriermlm is OK. It's very well integrated with courier, just as ezmlm-idx is with qmail. I suspect that it may be missing some features that make other list managers more flexible and easy to use. I've never used it for a production list since I hacked ezmlm-idx to work with Courier, and I already had lists set up for that from when I was using qmail, and my list subscribers expected the web-based archives that ezmlm-idx supports. I'm not sure how couriermlm handles such things as distribution-only lists, per-subscriber moderation, VERP management, etc. -- Lindsay Haisley | "Fighting against human | PGP public key FMP Computer Services | creativity is like | available at 512-259-1190 | trying to eradicate | <http://pubkeys.fmp.com> http://www.fmp.com | dandelions" | | (Pamela Jones) | ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
