Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Justin writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Justin Murdock writes:
Am I missing something obvious?
"MYRIGHTS" is an ACL1 command. The draft actually refers to the
"LIST(MYRIGHTS)" command.
I think this confusion is down to the moving target, and while we were
refering to "the draft" we were in fact referring to different drafts -
you the ACL2, I the ACL1.
I'm looking at draft-ietf-imapext-2086upd-01.txt (and now -02.txt)
which is a proposed "updated list of rights" for ACL1 which has as
standard "lrswipkxtea" with "cd" as virtual rights - which MUST be
returned /in addition/ to the "kxet" flags in a MYRIGHTS response.
I note they've "fixed" the "c" flag to be "k" and "x"
They didn't really "fix" anything. They just broke more things, and
called it a "fix".
Hence the inverted commas. Abandoning the "d" flag (or augmenting it)
makes sense as its function has been split. Changing the "c" flag allows
an updated ACL client know if it is dealing with an old or updated ALC1
server.
If you're messing with maildiracl, you have to know which clients you
will be dealing with.
I though the point of having backwards compatability was that you didn't?
ACL2 is not backwards compatible with ACL1.
this becoming mute with the
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
