Julian Mehnle wrote: > > Jay Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Julian Mehnle said: > > > If it's a cost issue, run just one (i.e. drop the differently > > > configured secondary MX). That's what I actually do. > > > > Have you ever had issues with downtime or lost mail? > > Nothing where a secondary MX would have helped.
Once that happened to me: a server monitor in North America sent me a warning that my web server was not reachable. I received it through the secondary MX while that monitor was still not reachable from my net. I don't think such sporadic result justifies running an uncontrolled secondary MX. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
