Alan Milligan Wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Lloyd, > > > This finally brings me to my questions: has anyone had any > > experience with AuthCourier and spamd? If so, does it work well? > > Are there any gotchas? > > > Yes, this works as advertised. However, you will have to adjust where > to look for the authdaemon socket since Sam moved it as part of the > courier-authlib separation.
Thank you. I now tried AuthCourier with SpamAssassin-3.0.3, and it only works if I set the permissions of the /var/spool/authdaemon directory to 751 (they originally were 750). This is needed because that directory is owned by courier:courier, but spamd changes to a non-privileged user ID before getpwuid() or getpwnam() get called (AuthCourier replaces these routines with versions which get their info from the authdaemon socket). Do any of you see a problem with using 751 for the permissions on that directory? Hmm ... or perhaps I should change my spamassassin startup file to force spamd to run as user "courier". Does anyone see a problem with that? Thanks. -- Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] God bless you. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
