Randall Shaw wrote:
This is complete bull, because I refuse to setup delivery to a well-known email box for spammers to fill with their SHIT.
Oh, it's going to get worse. Wait until Hotmail tries to force Sender-ID on us, and that silly SPF mess.
<<< 550-from domains whose servers reject the postmaster address.
Who says you have to have a mailbox for it? Just have it accept mail for postmaster and then /dev/null it if you so desire. Not having a valid postmaster/abuse address winds you up on rfc-ignorant.org and a few other lists as well.
Actually, I don't get much spam to my postmaster address. even a lot of the viruses avoid mailing abuse@, postmaster@, hostmaster@, sysop@, etc...
Bite me you steaming worm sexing pickle poking system!
*spits coffee everywhere* - ok, *that* was funny. heh. :P ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
