Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lloyd Zusman writes: > >> Sam Varshavchik Wrote: >> >>> Cam writes: >>>> [ ... ] >>> >>> Mail logs are certainly not meaningless. They tell you exactly what >> happens >>> to every message. >>> > [ ... ] >>> See the mail logs. They tell you everything. >>> > [ ... ] >>> Look at the mail logs. >> It's true that there is a lot of information in the mail logs, but at >> least one >> piece of data is missing: the HELO/EHLO value. One can debate how >> useful this information is, but since it's important enough for Courier's >> SPF code to check, it seems to me that it's also important enough to >> appear in the logs for us humans to see. >> Thoughts? > > If the SPF check fails, the error message will indicate the rejected domain > (unless the sender's SPF rule specifies a custom error message). > > Once EHLO/HELO is processed, there's really no benefit in logging this > further. It becomes totally and completely unimportant.
But what if someone doesn't want to use SPF but still wants to see the HELO/EHLO value in the logs? Every other piece of information in the SMTP dialog is there, why not HELO/EHLO? -- Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] God bless you. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
