Chris Petersen zei: > I've been toying with an interesting idea at work, and since I couldn't > come up with any ideas on my own (or my circle of friends/coworkers), I > thought I'd present it here for more opinions (since courier is our > current choice of mail server). > > .... > > That much I think courier can handle (or so I've inferred from > conversations on this list), and will most likely be what we do, but > what I'm wondering is if anyone has heard of a way that the servers > could be replicated (like a database does) so that people offsite could > check their mail (IMAP) at the colo server instead of coming in via our > slow DSL connection. So far, I've heard of several one-way options (eg. > rsync or drbd), but nothing capable of passing changes both directions > to keep both the colo and local servers completely in sync. > > Though I doubt that this could actually be done, it does at least > present an interesting concept idea, so I thought I'd put it up for > discussion.
How about Coda? (http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/). It may work for this, even over a slow connection. This obviously assumes new mail volume is reasonably low, otherwise the DSL will be a bottleneck regardless of the solution you choose. M4 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
