On 2006-04-13, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > This SPF record is broken, and violates the SPF specification draft. > > smtpcluster.computing.csbsju.edu does not have an MX record, and the SPF > draft explicitly states that "mx" entries _MUST_ have MX records, and SPF > **WILL NOT** fall back to looking up an A record, if the MX record is > absent. >
I just realized thats a good idea to include "error" in BOFHSPFMAILFROM. Without "error" any error situation in a particular mechanism aborts the whole SPF checking process without consulting the other, following mechanisms. I hope that this setting has no other sideeffects... -- Georg ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
