Gordon Messmer wrote:
JP wrote:
Sam, if someone else were to write an acceptable patch that updated
SQWebmail to handle larger cookies, would you be willing to accept it
into the main trunk?
While making that argument, consider that allowing greater input means
that you may increase the likelihood of a buffer overflow occurring in
one of the external tools that sqwebmail uses.
>
> I'd personally work on keeping siteminder's data out of sqwebmail.
The modification required is minor enough that it can be done for the
site that needs it.
An option to avoid cookie pollution may make sense in siteminder.
(Too many cooks spoil the broth.)
However, why shouldn't webmail just discard unwanted cookies,
rather than storing them in the environment?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
