On 03.01.2007, at 14:03, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Lorenzo Perone wrote: >> Actually - as a side thought... : wouldn't it be better to use an >> envelope sender >> (be it a mailer-daemon address - did i missed to configure it >> somewhere) ? >> i might not be the only one who rejects non-local/trusted mails with >> an absent/invalid envelope sender address. > > Absent and invalid are different cases. Domains who reject empty > senders should be listed in http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-dsn.php
ohps.. that ought to be changed right away (done...). that rfc however - as most of the mail chapter - was defiinitively written when spam-floods were not an issue... (but that's a different discussion.) thanx & regards! Lorenzo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
