-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bowie Bailey wrote: > I agree that it is more efficient to check the size BEFORE calling spamc, > but I was just pointing out that this check is unlikely to solve his problem > since spamc already prevents large messages from being processed.
I agree, but bugs are difficult to catch. I wanted to see if avoiding large messages of ever reaching spamc would, at least, show where the problem might be. Sorry if I was not clear enough. :) - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica ¿No sabés a dónde ir a comer o tomar algo? Visitá www.vivamoslavida.com.ar LISTA DE CASAMIENTO: Cualquier Fravega a nombre de Busleiman (37520). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFnnzqAlpOsGhXcE0RAo6rAJwL3l+a7sEj6B6IkbinykB5MUTOhQCfe3RA Go7tJVh6cQwATwLTTT+zds4= =90cA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
