Gordon Messmer wrote: > + <para> > +This is a limitation in the current implementation of CIDR parsing. > +When networks specified in CIDR notation are found in the source file, > +they are converted to enumerations of the net blocks or IP addresses > +that are members of the specified network, in the format appropriate > +for the access file. In the above example, 192.68.0.10 would be > +produced as part of this conversion, and would conflict with the later > +definition of the same address.</para>
If this is true, then for 10.0.0.0/8 we'll get 16M addresses? And for 2002::/16 -- 2^112! Where will we store that much?! Even 2001:x:y:z::/64 (which is realistic when IPv6 will get some steam) is too much to be named individually. -- Aidas Kasparas IT administrator GM Consult Group, UAB ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
