Bill Schindler writes:
Someone else mentioned this last week. Reading the spec literally, it seems like the correct result code in this situation should be "unknown", and I'll make this change in the next version.Which spec are you reading, Sam? Are you looking at RFC 4408 (http:// www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4408.txt) or some earlier iteration?
I was looking at an earlier version.
pgpWEquFM6ruM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
