On Cz, 2008-07-03 at 18:26 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Paweł Tęcza writes: > > > So, my question is: why don't you set SENDER='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > or SENDER='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' or something similar if SENDER > > variable is empty? > > > > In that case, if user's forward is broken, then Courier is trying > > to deliver a DSN message to a postmaster, not to a user with not > > working forward. I think it's reasonable solution, because information > > about broken user's forward is valuable for mail system administrator. > > > > What's your opinion? > > Yes, I think that's reasonable. The original reason for resetting the return > address would be to be notified if forwarded mail bounces. I expected people > to set up forwarding rules carefully, and take care not to indiscriminantly > forward all mail, rather only ones that match narrow filtering criteria. > > But I suppose that's too much to expect, from people, so I guess this will > have to change. I'll change the return address on forwarded mail to a null > address, which will bounce to the postmaster's mailbox automatically.
Hello Sam, Thanks a lot for your feedback! I'm glad to see you will change it :) Have a nice coding day, Pawel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
