Hello,

I'm facing a strange behaviour.
 From my server (hebergement-pro.org) to a remote one I upgraded right 
now (sim-plage.com), I have this strange behaviour:

        Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on 
ns300321.ovh.net
        X-Spam-Level: *
        X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,TVD_SPACE_RATIO
                autolearn=no version=3.2.5
        Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr 
[::ffff:212.27.42.35])
                by mail.sim-plage.com with esmtp; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:40:08 
+0200
                id 0002A3EC.487D3558.00000949
        Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
                by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339333F61C5
                for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:40:08 +0200 (CEST)
        Received: from serveur.hebergement-pro.org
                (sal69-1-82-231-94-173.fbx.proxad.net [82.231.94.173])
                by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1103F616F
                for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:40:08 +0200 (CEST)
        Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([::ffff:192.168.1.7])
                (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA)
                by serveur.hebergement-pro.org with esmtp;
                Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:40:06 +0200 id 00010193.487D3556.00002895
        Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:40:05 +0200
        From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Blion?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
        MIME-Version: 1.0
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: test
        Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
        Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

        testntent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

        test

if I desactivate the spamassassin plugin on the remote host: 

        Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr 
[::ffff:212.27.42.35])
          by mail.sim-plage.com with esmtp; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:45:07 +0200
          id 0002A0FA.487D3683.0000109C
        Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
                by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C394A3F6208
                for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:45:07 +0200 (CEST)
        Received: from serveur.hebergement-pro.org 
(sal69-1-82-231-94-173.fbx.proxad.net [82.231.94.173])
                by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1873F618F
                for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:45:07 +0200 (CEST)
        X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
                serveur.hebergement-pro.org
        X-Spam-Level: 
        X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 
tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
                TVD_SPACE_RATIO autolearn=no version=3.2.5
        Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([::ffff:192.168.1.7])
                (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA)
                by serveur.hebergement-pro.org with esmtp;
                Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:45:05 +0200 id 00010193.487D3681.00002C75
        Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:45:04 +0200
        From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Blion?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
        MIME-Version: 1.0
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: test
        Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
        Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

        test



If I send a mail from sim-plage.com to hebergement-pro.org, I have no problems.
If I desactivate Spamassassin from any side, everything works fine.

hebergement-pro.org : Courier 0.59 / Pythonfilter 1.2
sim-plage.com : Courier 0.60 / Pythonfilter 1.2

Exactly the same pythonfilter configuration files (scp powered)
Does anybody have any idea of the root cause of this problem?

One of the main difference I pointed out is that X-Spam-Checker-Version header 
has not the same number of lines. Could it be the reason?

Jerome Blion.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to