Sam Varshavchik ha scritto: > Alessandro Vesely writes: > >> Currently, the only way that one can concede forwarding is by IP address. > > That's beside the point.
It is a problem. What if the remote host could log in? > The bottom line is this. Your email address is > [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you need to have example.com forward all your mail > to [EMAIL PROTECTED], you'll just have to live with the fact that you can > no longer check SPF on received mail. If you still want to check SPF, > this still has to be done by example.com. Absolutely agreed. >> Rewriting the sender's address currently works, but is wrong for >> backup MXes. Isn't there room for designing a better solution? > > Your backup MXs should check SPF themselves. Yes, unless for some reason I want to disable SPF checking. That might work with Received-SPF headers, like the BLOCK2 flag does for DNSBLs. (I only do the latter, though.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
