On 08/31/2010 10:44 AM, Nathan Eady wrote: > Even given a PHP interpreter already loaded, I'd be fairly surprised > if a PHP wrapper *improved* on the performance of a small binary. I > think I would want to see a peer-reproduced controlled study before I > would believe something like that.
Who cares? The original request was for FastCGI support in the cgi application because nginx doesn't support CGI. Users of nginx can't use the sqwebmail cgi as it is. The easiest solution would be to wrap the CGI: http://wiki.nginx.org/NginxSimpleCGI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
