> > >> While this is not an official standard, it's being quite widely used and > > >> support for courier would be nice.
> > On 08/Nov/10 15:47, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > > Widely used by lazy admins > > A summary of possible methods, by good old Frank Ellerman: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00636.html On 10.11.10 16:34, Michelle Konzack wrote: > The error with bind syntax check and DNSSEC is, that "." is not a valid > FQDN. And one thing was forgotten: > > IN MX localhost. > > :-D which works and does not produce errors with the bind9 syntax check > or DNSSEC. This causes the "mail loops back to myself"-style error at receiving and no error at sending time, unless you put 127.0.0.1 to "badmx" in BOFH. Yes, I did that. It's better than nothing. But it's not general solution, in fact it's worse than nullmx. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Atheism is a non-prophet organization. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
