On Wed 20/Jun/2012 01:36:32 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Alessandro Vesely writes: >> Jun 11 20:57:34 north courierlocal: [...] size=5061 >> Jun 11 20:53:18 north courierlocal: [...] size=4921
The supposedly lost message was just 140 bytes longer than the second (size should have increased by 1k at least) > The first message does not look like a copy of the second one. It's > size is much smaller. I would expect that a copy of a message sent > through a mailing list would be larger than a CC from the sender, with > the additional mailing list headers thrown in the mix. You're right, and I'm an idiot: comparing the sequence of archived messages with the log of incoming SMTP connections from that list made it obvious that the line I quoted was related to the next message from the list --which I had received and read, but not paired with its log entry. Anyway, thank you so much, Sam and Gordon, for helping me out of that grief. Thus, it was a remote Mailman's hiccup (I have no entry for that network on that day's "Errs/net" log page.) I'm happy to file away as urban legend this hypothesis of a message lost upon reception (and I'll try and be more precise with log lookups). -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
