On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:54:43 -0500 Jeff Potter <jpotter-cour...@codepuppy.com> wrote:
> I’d support such a project, but based on my experience with my users, > the ones for whom it would help wouldn’t care about it or understand > the need. I’ve started recommending to my clients to use port 465 by > default. I'm not talking about educating users. I talk about educating mail client developers that they ship sane defaults. They should make it impossible to accidently have an unencrypted connection. Probably they should even make it impossible to do unencrypted connections at all. But not sure this is the right place to discuss it, hope we don't annoy others with offtopic discussions. -- Hanno Böck http://hboeck.de/ mail/jabber: ha...@hboeck.de GPG: BBB51E42
pgpnBeaRtwE9z.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
