On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 21:04 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > Yeah, and you shouldn't even mention these TLDs in your email, apparently.
> > > Otherwise, Google thinks your account has been hacked, and you just sent a
> > > phishing email; so it gets displayed with a red banner warning.
> >
> > Oh yeah?  No surprise there.  Sam, have you seen this personally? Or can
> > you cite a news article or some other source about this?
> 
> Oh, certainly I've seen this personally. With your very own email, actually,  
> which Google warned me, using the aforementioned red banner, that it  
> "might've" come from a compromised account. None of your other emails in  
> this thread were tagged the same way, in my GMail account.
> 
> There was absolutely no other reason, other than the content, since the  
> headers, everything, et. al. were the same as the other 3-4 messages you  
> sent around the same time. Only the content of the email was different, and  
> that tripped something in the Googlebrain.

Heh!  So much for the new TLDs.  According to one of my tech friends
here in Austin, Google has gotten a bit squirrely and less effective in
their spam rejection algorithms.

If Jon Postel were alive today he'd be turning over in his grave.

-- 
Lindsay Haisley       | "Behold! Our way lies through a
FMP Computer Services |    dark wood whence in which
512-259-1190          |      weirdness may wallow!”
http://www.fmp.com    |           --Beauregard


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to