Le 09/03/2016 04:13, Gordon Messmer a écrit : > On 03/08/2016 05:21 PM, Jérôme Blion wrote: >> What do you think about that? > I'd like to do something more general to make filters conditional on the > results of others, but I haven't given it the time... > > Maybe something like: > > whitelist_auth conditional > comeagain if not whitelist_auth > attachments > spamassassin > clamav > log_aliases > noduplicates > > Wouldn't be very hard to parse. Any better ideas? > Hello
Right now, filters have 3 kind of replies: - accept - reject - neutral Do you agree with me? A word like "THEN" or "OR" could do the trick : whitelist_auth OR/THEN comeagain attachments spamassassin clamav To pass, a mail should go through all rules until a 200, 400, 500 has been raised or the end of filters' list. We could consider each line delimits a filtering rule. This line should end with an only one accept/reject/neutral situation : - all filter in a line could reject the mail (4xx/5xx). The first reject is enough. - only the last filter could accept it (2xx code). It means previous 2xx codes are silently transformed to neutral - the last filter may return a neutral Now, I only worked on filters, I didn't look at the main code... I have absolutely no idea about the needed work to implement that :-) What do you think about that ? Would it be easily feasible? HTH. Jerome Blion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785111&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
