On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 11:45 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen < [email protected]> wrote:
> Couldn't all the author's and editor's draft happen in the central > repository as well? Git has branches, so it is easy to have an > author's branch. As everything will just have one history, it will > make things easier for reviewers and testers. > That would require me to manage accounts and permissions for lots of people. Furthermore, I don't think Github has the fine-grained controls that I would need to be able to manage the master branch while giving authors and contributors free rein in other branches. If people use pull requests, but in their own repos, history is still unified in the end.
