On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 7:14 PM Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Let's wait until we have the new implementation for 209. 113 can go as > > soon as we see if there are any comments from the 113 mailing list, I > think. > > It's ready. I just opened a pull request (on GitHub) for it. > Merged and pushed. But the language John sent for the PFN for 209 isn't quite right: there was no "linear update" section in 209 before. There are two paragraphs about it. I'll link to them from the PFN. But they don't specify *which* enum-set argument would be modified in the case of procedures whose names end with "!" and take more than one enum-set argument. I'm assuming that the first argument should always be the only one mutated. Is that right? (That needed clarification regardless of this change.)
