On 2022-09-16 16:39 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > Your interpretation is right and the implementation is borked, I don't know > why.
No, I’m very sorry, the implementation(s) are fine. I don’t know how I happened to get that result. Shiro’s (and my) implementations both defer to SRFI 1 ‘zip’, which correctly gives ((1) (2) (3)) in that example. Again, sorry for the noise. -- Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <[email protected]>
