(added the list) Am So., 9. Apr. 2023 um 22:15 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <[email protected]>:
Thank you for reviewing so quickly. > For "preceding" read "following", or else move the explanation between the > definitions and the examples. I will reformulate it. > After "the same record" add "(in the sense of `equal?`)". "In the sense of equal?" would be wrong. It is the same sameness as between (1 . ()) and (1). > For "forth" read "fourth" (twice). I think Arthur already corrected it. > The last sentence should probably read "is valid" for "is". I mean: "is [self-contained]". > > On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 12:14 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Am Do., 6. Apr. 2023 um 06:13 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <[email protected]>: >> > >> > A few examples of the external representation of records should be >> > provided. >> >> Yes! >> >> I added a few (previewable in my personal repo), so they will appear >> in the final version. >> >> Marc
