Am Sa., 22. Apr. 2023 um 05:00 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <[email protected]>: > > The problem with SRFI 97 is that you need either just a number (which is > standard in R7RS) or a number plus a mnemonic but not predictable name, but > if the SRFI exports multiple libraries, you have to call them (srfi <number> > <srfi-name> <library-hame>); you can't omit the supposedly optional > <srfi-name>.
I don't see a problem here as long as the mnemonic name is part of the SRFI's API. This is what SRFI 97 already demands from post-SRFI 97 SRFIs.
