On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:07 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't understand. Isn't it to make it possible to put literals > representing these values into one's program? Are you looking for a > purpose beyond that? > The alternative view is that we should not have such literals, but simply use macros of the form (s32 1 2 15 3453) that work at expand time rather than read time. See <https://codeberg.org/scheme/r7rs/issues/109> for the most recent discussion. > By the way, I just checked, and Marc Feeley, the author, is still > subscribed to this mailing list. > I'd be surprised if he weren't.
