On Nov 6, 6:27 pm, "Tony Bacigalupo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I understand it, a couple of people like Tara and Chris and others have
> direct control over things like the blog and the wiki's design and
> structure, and they're people I think we would largely trust to continue to
> do right by the movement in implementing a new design (with, of course, our
> input along the way), but, they're also probably the least likely to have
> time to allocate for doing so :-)
>
> So we'd need someone to step up and take leadership on it.
I think you hit the nail on the head, Tony.
If there is one thing I have learned through being involved in large
collaborative groups of people its that every group needs a leader of
sorts. They may not be the person who rolls up their sleeves and does
the heavy lifting, they just need to be the decision maker.
Even if Tara, Chris, and whoever else who may be administrating the
sites and tools don't see themselves as the leaders, the perception of
this community seems to tell me we see them as the individuals in
charge. It doesn't me we need to have a hierarchy to our structure,
but we need someone to be the decision makers. W
e also need people to lead various efforts, someone who has time to
properly lead them if we want them to get done. The people that do the
heavy lifting can look to the project leads for direction, and the
group leaders for making the tough decisions.
My 2 cents anyway.
- Nick
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Coworking" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
