Hello everyone. I'd like to point to a few external examples that can
help lend some structure (or lack thereof) to this discussion.

Firstly, anyone participating in this thread who has not yet read The
Starfish and the Spider should go and do so now... I'll wait. The
audio version is only 5.5 hours long... It really nails the "federated
yet united" idea - the story about Alcoholics Anonymous' attempts to
centralize should be a very telling case study.

Second, I suggest you take a look at what the folks at Fractured Atlas
have already conjured up. RE: Health Insurance and centralized
services that don't get in your way. They are an association that
provides support services for artists and arts groups.

In their home state of New York, they have a few health care options
available, and in most other states, they just default to Aetna with 3
pre-selected plans. They also do liablility insurance if, for example,
you need to run a big event.
http://www.fracturedatlas.org/site/healthcare/

Fractured Altas can also act as a non-profit surrogate if you need
501c3 status, but you may only need it one-time, or don't have your
status yet. They even work with the person donating the money and make
sure you are using it for the activity you promised. Accountability++

The other things they provide are clearly demarcated on their site,
but among them are access to training (mostly online, like tips for
running your business, much like Indy Hall's videos), discounts on
software and resources, a social networking site, and a few other
things. At the same time, there are several social networking sites
for artists, they don't claim to be canonical, they just want to
provide for their members.
http://www.fracturedatlas.org/

The organization is VERY lightweight. I think they have 10 people in
the office at most, but they are serving a national member base. They
don't try to make policy decisions or tell artists how to run their
business, or give them a cohesive mission. That is up to each
individual.

My point is to not think too hard about this - take the Akim's Razor
approach. What is the absolute minimum required to create a connection
between coworking spaces who opt in to the federated plan? What are a
few things that can be done to reduce duplicate efforts?

People who tend to create movements - space catalysts - often feel
that they are the only person in the universe who has had the idea -
how do we make those people feel welcome and unique in the face of a
national / international body with membership dues and rules and...
and... and... and...

Then there is the obvious bike shed problem, which is why the
discussions about an "official" coworking social networking site tend
to be so circular. It's hard to get all these people to agree on the
right way to create something - let alone a bank.
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking/browse_thread/thread/3d1b2cfa56ad7033/a93945fd2f65dc6b?lnk=gst&q=website#a93945fd2f65dc6b
http://www.bikeshed.com/

I'm not claiming to be infallible over here, I get really excited
about the possibility of making life easier for other people who are
fighting the same battle, and I start thinking the big thoughts all
the time.

My question would be "How can we make the Visa program something so
amazing that it ends up spawning this organization by its very
existence?" i.e. will there reach a point that Visa is centralized,
and we are able to use that as a thread to tie the rest of this stuff
together? Visa is the one thing most everyone seems to be able to
agree on, aside from the core values. So maybe that's where this
discussion should start.

Peace,
Ryan Price
CoLab Orlando
Orlando, FL
[email protected]
@liberatr
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Coworking" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to