Alex, I'll sell you its liabilities for $7.99! :) Cheapest. Insurance. Evar! :)
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Alex Hillman <[email protected]>wrote: > Valued based on what? Pagerank? Value is only realized of and when > there is a buyer. > > I'll offer you $7.99 for that domain, plus godady transfer fees. > > What? It can't hurt to try. > > -Alex > > On Wednesday, March 3, 2010, Laban Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This an opportunity for the coworking community to demonstrate the > > effectiveness and awesomeness of its core values, such as collaboration > > and openness. > > > > I own a domain which is valued at $900,000. That's really nothing - the > estimated value of http://www.twitter.com is: $855,408,000, and the > estimated value of http://www.facebook.com is: $1,848,000,000 > > > > Coworking.com is already a Page Rank 5, and its value will be what YOU > make of it. Doesn't each and every co-worker have some interest in whatever > becomes of coworking.com? > > > > A domain name is an asset and all assets have liabilities. Imaginable or > not, people take pot shots at anything worth something, including web sites. > Web sites are sued all the time just for existing - ask @ev. > > > > A domain name must be owned by someone or some*thing*, and while it can > be held by one person in trust for a group, won't you want to protect that > person and the group from potential liability and losses by establishing > some sort of structure legal structure which allow for such openness and > collaboration without having to "go all corporate", such as a cooperative? > Isn't it worth doing something if it can be both an asset and a protection? > > > > ;) > > > > Laban > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Tara Hunt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Exactly why do people want to set up a charitable organization? What > would it get us? > > The buying of the domain was the first time that money has come into the > equation and that was an anomaly IMO. Alex offered clear advantages and a > choice for those who wanted to be part of it (nobody was forced to > contribute and they knew exactly what they would get out of it). > > > > > > > > T > > -- > > tara 'missrogue' hunt > > > > Book: The Whuffie Factor (http://www.thewhuffiefactor.com) > > Blog: HorsePigCow: Marketing Uncommon (http://horsepigcow.com) > > Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/missrogue > > phone: 514-679-2951 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Coworking" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<coworking%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en. > > > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Coworking" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<coworking%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en. > > > > -- > > /ah > indyhall.org > coworking in philadelphia > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Coworking" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<coworking%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Coworking" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
